What a crock of dog feces article, its lack depth or any critic of the real issue at hand, how can a company be sold short +200%. I’m sure the suckers did that. Or is it the suckers like Greenberg that write FUD articles with no real bases, because their “handlers” demanded so. lol!
Times must be a changing. I remember when any stock trading below $5 was considered a "penny stock!" It seems the Financial Times has re-defined it to $1 or less.
I didn’t know about the $5 cap for penny stocks. Being British, I had assumed that penny stocks were any stock priced at less than one hundred pennies (one pound) or one hundred cents (one dollar).
What a crock of dog feces article, its lack depth or any critic of the real issue at hand, how can a company be sold short +200%. I’m sure the suckers did that. Or is it the suckers like Greenberg that write FUD articles with no real bases, because their “handlers” demanded so. lol!
‘Berkshire for suckers’: that is superb.
Times must be a changing. I remember when any stock trading below $5 was considered a "penny stock!" It seems the Financial Times has re-defined it to $1 or less.
I didn’t know about the $5 cap for penny stocks. Being British, I had assumed that penny stocks were any stock priced at less than one hundred pennies (one pound) or one hundred cents (one dollar).
Travel well, Herb!